MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014376689 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.596

Phase Behaviour of CO2–Brine and CO2–Oil Systems for CO2 Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery: Experimental Studies

2014· article· en· W2014376689 on OpenAlexaff
Nader Mosavat, Ali Abedini, Farshid Torabi

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolubilityBrineHydrocarbonExtraction (chemistry)ChemistrySwellingCarbon dioxideChromatographyPetroleum engineeringMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryGeologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was conducted to investigate the phase behaviour of CO 2 –brine and CO 2 –oil systems under various operating conditions. Through this study, CO 2 solubility measurement tests were carried out for CO 2 –water, CO 2 –brine, and CO 2 –oil mixtures at various equilibrium pressures ranging Peq = 0.7–10.3 MPa and temperatures ranging Texp = 21–40 °C. Additionally, series of oil swelling/extraction tests were conducted at aforementioned experimental conditions using a see-through high- pressure cell to determine the oil swelling factor at various equilibrium conditions. CO 2 solubility measurement tests showed that at constant temperatures, an increase in CO 2 solubility value was observed for CO 2 –water, CO 2 –brine, and CO 2 –oil mixtures when the equilibrium pressure increases. Furthermore, as it was expected for all mixtures, the solubility of CO 2 reduces with increased temperature. In this study, it was also found that at a constant temperature, the oil swelling factor, SF , increases up to a pressure so called extraction pressure, Pext , at which majority of the light to medium hydrocarbon groups in the oil phase are extracted by CO 2 and vaporized into the CO 2 -rich phase. Additionally, it was observed that for the pressures higher than the extraction pressure, the oil swelling factor reduced with equilibrium pressure because more hydrocarbon components were extracted at higher pressures. The extraction pressure was determined at different experimental temperatures and results revealed that the extraction pressure increases by increasing experimental temperature. Comparison of the CO 2 solubility values in oil at extraction pressures corresponding to different experimental temperatures also showed that the major hydrocarbon extraction occurs when a certain amount of CO 2 has dissolved in the oil phase which is called threshold CO 2 solubility, χth . The defined threshold CO 2 solubility was found to be approximately the same for the CO 2 –oil mixture under this study at different temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207