Short‐term exposure to constant light promotes strong circadian phase‐resetting responses to nonphotic stimuli in Syrian hamsters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Behavioral (nonphotic) stimuli can shift circadian rhythms by serotonin (5-HT) and/or neuropeptide Y (NPY) inputs to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) circadian clock. Based on the idea that behavioral phase resetting is modulated by endogenous changes in postsynaptic sensitivity to such transmitters, hamsters were exposed to constant light (LL; approximately 250 lx) for 1-3 days, which suppresses locomotor activity and eliminates the daily rhythm of SCN 5-HT release measured by microdialysis. Groups subjected to brief LL or maintained under a light/dark cycle (LD) received phase-resetting treatments with the 5-HT(1A,7) agonist (+/-)-2-dipropyl-amino-8-hydroxyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronapthalene (8-OH-DPAT) or sleep deprivation (SD). Animals were released to constant darkness at the start of the treatments. Phase advances to 8-OH-DPAT and SD during the day were 11 and 3 h for LL vs. 2 and 1 h for LD, respectively. Phase delays during the night were -12 and -5 h for LL vs. no responses for LD, respectively. Phase-transition curves for both LL treatments had slopes approximating 0, indicative of Type 0 phase resetting. For all treatments, the degree of locomotor suppression by LL was not correlated with the phase shift magnitude. Re-establishing locomotor activity by overnight food deprivation did not prevent potentiated shifting to SD. However, re-establishing peak extracellular 5-HT levels by intra-SCN 5-HT reverse microdialysis perfusion in LL did significantly reduce potentiated 8-OH-DPAT phase advances. Constant light also enhanced intra-SCN NPY-induced phase advances during the day (6 vs. 2 h for LD). These results suggest that LL promotes Type 0 phase resetting by supersensitizing 5-HT and/or NPY postsynaptic responses and possibly by attenuating the amplitude of the circadian pacemaker, thus enhancing circadian clock resetting nonspecifically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".