INFLUENCE OF AN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM ON MEDICAL STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TO SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS IN PREGNANCY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Substance use disorders (SUDs) in pregnancy are becoming increasingly prevalent. Our study aimed to measure the effect of a teaching module on alcohol, tobacco, and drug use on the attitude of second year medical students toward pregnant women with SUDs. A questionnaire was administered to 84 medical students before a 5-week systems block on human reproduction, which included specific learning events related to SUDs. The questionnaire was readministered at the completion of the block. Pre- and postintervention scores were compared. Students showed significant improvement (p < .05, reliability coefficient 0.90) in their level of comfort in dealing with womenwith SUD in pregnancy. Other positive trends relating to attitudes toward drug- and alcohol-dependent women during pregnancy were also identified. SUD teaching interventions among medical students can improve their comfort level and attitude toward pregnant women with SUDs. This supports the current initiative of Project CREATE (Curriculum Renewal and Evaluation of Addiction Training and Education) to implement a comprehensive undergraduate SUD teaching program in Canadian medical schools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".