MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Synthesis of -Willemite Nanoparticles by Post-calcination of Flame-made Zinc Oxide/Silica Composites

2002· article· en· W2014477820 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueParticle & Particle Systems Characterization · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFlame retardant materials and properties
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalcinationMaterials scienceChemical engineeringCrystallizationNanoparticleComposite numberThermal stabilityAmorphous solidPyrolysisZincParticle sizeComposite materialMetallurgyNanotechnologyCatalysisChemistryCrystallographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Composite ZnO/SiO2 nanoparticles were made by flame spray pyrolysis (FSP). Characteristics of the product powder and its crystallization behavior on post-calcination were evaluated. Polyhedral aggregates of nano-sized primary particles consisting of ZnO nano-crystals 1–3 nm in size and amorphous SiO2 were obtained by FSP. A short residence time in the flame can result in the co-existence of the ZnO and SiO2 clusters without substitution or reaction hindering each other's grain growth. There was almost no change in the XRD pattern by calcination at 600 °C for 2 h, suggesting a high thermal stability of the ZnO nano-crystals in the composite particles. A pure α-willemite phase was obtained at 900 °C. At this calcination temperature, dC and dBET of the powder were 63 and 44 nm, respectively. The nano-composite structure of the FSP-made particles can suppress crystalline growth of ZnO during calcination to maintain a high reactivity of ZnO with SiO2, obtaining pure α-willemite with high specific surface area at low calcination temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it