MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014560602 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2002.86.12.1406b

First Report of Foliar and Root Infection of Carrot by <i>Sclerotinia minor</i> in Ontario, Canada

2002· article· en· W2014560602 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cezarina Kora, G. J. Boland, Mary Ruth McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSclerotinia sclerotiorumMyceliumBiologyDaucus carotaInoculationPotato dextrose agarSclerotiniaHorticultureBotanySpotsRoot rotCrown (dentistry)AgarBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2000 and 2001, commercial carrots (Daucus carota L.) cv. Cellobunch grown in organic soils in Ontario, Canada, developed water-soaked, dark olive-green lesions on leaves that were in contact with soil. Lesions spread rapidly to petioles and adjacent leaves when prolonged moist conditions occurred within the canopy and persisted through harvest. A soft rot lesion was observed on the crown of one carrot root in the field, but no disease symptoms were detected on carrot samples in cold storage. Symptoms on leaves and roots of carrots were similar to sclerotinia rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, a common disease in the area, except for the signs of sparser mycelia and smaller sclerotia. White mycelium and irregular, black sclerotia (0.5 to 2 mm) that formed on the surface of diseased leaf and root tissues were plated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated at 20 ± 1°C. Within 3 to 4 days, numerous mycelial clumps developed throughout the surface of white colonies and within 5 to 7 days these clumps developed into sclerotia. The pathogen was identified as S. minor Jagger (1). In the growth-room, young and senescing leaves of eight carrot (cv. Cellobunch) plants and 20 surface-disinfested roots were inoculated with 5-mm mycelial disks from the margins of colonies of one isolate of S. minor or S. sclerotiorum grown on PDA. A control treatment of an equal set of test units inoculated with sterile PDA plugs was also included. Inoculated plants and roots were incubated at 21 ± 1°C and ≈100% relative humidity for 21 days. Plants inoculated with S. minor, lesions, mycelial clumps, and sclerotia developed on the surface of leaves and petioles 1, 2, and 10 days postinoculation, respectively and were similar to those observed in the field. Lesions progressed faster on senescing leaves and reached the base of the petiole within 7 days, however, infection of the rosette or crown did not occur under these test conditions. In roots, lesions, mycelia, and sclerotia were observed 2, 4 and 10 days postinoculation, respectively, and sclerotia sometimes adhered in large aggregate crusts. S. minor was reisolated from infected tissues, completing Koch's postulates. Carrots inoculated with S. sclerotiorum yielded similar symptoms, but the white mycelium grew into cotton-like, dense mats and produced large (5 to 10 mm) individual sclerotia. Carrot has been previously reported as a host of S. minor (2), but to our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating the occurrence of sclerotinia rot of carrot caused by S. minor in Ontario. S. minor may not cause damage to carrots in storage, but may affect yield by weakening the tops needed for efficient mechanical harvest. Carrot crops where S. minor was identified are typically rotated with onions (Allium cepa L.), which is not a host of S. minor (2). However, this 1-year rotation is unlikely to suffice for reducing the accumulation of sclerotial inoculum in soil. The knowledge of the occurrence and prevalence of S. minor in carrot crops is a valuable consideration when planning to incorporate carrots in rotation with other hosts of S. minor. References: (1) L. M. Kohn. Mycotaxon 9:365, 1979. (2) M. S. Melzer et al. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 19:272, 1997.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207