MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LONG-TERM CIRCULATORY SUPPORT OUTSIDE OF THE HOSPITAL

2000· article· en· W2014603137 on OpenAlexaff
Tofy Mussivand, Paul Hendry, Roy G. Masters, Wilbert J. Keon

Bibliographic record

VenueASAIO Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLabor Market and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAssistive deviceMedical emergencyComputer sciencePhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Ventricular assist devices (VADS) are increasingly being utilized outside of the hospital setting. This application places additional and more stringent demands on device design and functionality. A fully implantable VAD (i.e. one that functions without the need for percutaneous leads and vents) has been developed. Methods: A major issue with long-term use of VADs outside of the hospital setting, is patient acceptability and quality of life. To address this issue, the HeartSaver VAD development program focused on 2 areas: 1) Implantability, and 2) Recipient Quality of Life Post-Implant. To improve implantability, the device is designed to be implanted in the thoracic cavity (via median sternotomy). The device will be anchored to the rib cage to eliminate device dislodgement. To improve recipient lifestyle, the device will be remotely monitored and controlled, freeing the patient from the need to frequently visit the hospital and allowing greater peace of mind for the recipient. The device utilizes remote power transfer and an internally implanted battery allows the recipient to indulge in a wide range of normal lifestyle activities (bathing, swimming, showering, changing clothes, etc.), unencumbered by any external components, further enhancing quality of life and freedom of movement. Results: The first prototype of the device has been operating on the bench for over 7 years failure free. Three series of in vivo studies (N=43) in bovine, for up to 30 days of support, have been conducted, demonstrating: 1) device implantability, 2) performance & ability to sustain circulation, and 3) remote monitoring and control capabilities. Studies to date, have demonstrated acceptable implantability and performance of the developed device. Based on these studies, a refined version of the device (pre-clinical version) was developed and manufactured. In vitro and in vivo studies of this pre-clinical version of the device are currently underway in preparation for clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASAIO JournalSame topicLabor Market and EducationFrench-language works237,207