MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014642407 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.125315

Anisotropic optical response of InP self-assembled quantum dots studied by pump-probe spectroscopy

2007· article· en· W2014642407 on OpenAlexafffund
Mitsuru Sugisaki, Hongwen Ren, Selvakumar V. Nair, Eiji Tokunaga, Kenichi Nishi, Yasuaki Masumoto, Harry E. Ruda

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsQuantum dotSpectroscopyExcitonAnisotropyDipoleOscillator strengthSpectral lineAtomic physicsEnergy (signal processing)PhotoluminescenceCondensed matter physicsMolecular physicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transient anisotropic reflectivity change spectra of InP quantum dots have been observed by means of two-color pump-probe spectroscopy. The results show a fast decay component with a lifetime of $100--200\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{ps}$ which depends on the probe energy, followed by the slow decay component of $\ensuremath{\sim}1\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{ns}$. The reflectivity change spectra have a dispersive shape having a maximum on the higher energy side of the photoluminescence (PL) band by $80\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{meV}$, and a dip located at the maximum of the PL band. Interestingly, the reflectivity change signals observed for the $[1\overline{1}0]$ and [110] polarizations have the opposite sign when the probe energy is set between the first and second exciton states. The temporal change of spectra is simulated by means of a Monte Carlo method, and the model is found to well reproduce the experimental result. Further, the model enables us to evaluate the microscopic exciton parameters of single quantum dots by macroscopic observations. The oscillator strengths along the [110] and $[1\overline{1}0]$ directions at the PL peak energy are evaluated to be ${f}_{x}=0.37$ and ${f}_{y}=0.71$, respectively. The oscillator strength is about five times smaller than simple theoretical estimates. This suggests a small overlap of the envelope functions which is consistent with the existence of a permanent dipole moment observed in these QDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207