Proposal to transfer ‘ <i>Aegyptianella ranarum</i> ’, an intracellular bacterium of frog red blood cells, to the family Flavobacteriaceae as ‘ <i>Candidatus</i> Hemobacterium ranarum’ comb. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
'Aegyptianella ranarum' (order Rickettsiales), an ultrastructurally defined small, Gram-negative rod, is known to replicate in the red blood cells of frogs. Heretofore, this bacterium has not been characterized genetically. We cloned and sequenced the 16S rRNA (1310 bp) and gyrB (718 bp) genes of 'A. ranarum' from a Canadian frog blood specimen. In situ hybridization (with an 'A. ranarum' 16S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction product as probe) and electron microscopy confirmed that 'A. ranarum' forms cytoplasmic inclusions in frog erythrocytes. blast comparisons with GenBank 16S rRNA and gyrB sequences showed that both 'A. ranarum' genes were most similar (91% and 67% identity) to those of Chryseobacterium meningosepticum, a bacterium in the family Flavobacteriaceae. In contrast, 'A. ranarum' 16S rRNA shared only 61% identity with Aegyptianella pullorum. Phylogenetic analyses of these genes using phylip supported 'A. ranarum' as a member of Flavobacteriaceae, but suggested that its cladistic sibling may be Bergeyella zoohelcum or Weeksella virosa, rather than C. meningosepticum. We propose to classify 'Aegyptianella ranarum' as 'Candidatus Hemobacterium ranarum' in the family Flavobacteriaceae. Our results provide a starting point for studies of related intraerythrocytic bacterial infections in frogs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".