Effect of High-Dose Verapamil Administration on the Ca <sup>2+</sup> Channel Density in Rat Cardiac Tissue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is well known that beta-adrenergic receptors will down-regulate in the presence of high circulating levels of beta-adrenergic agonists over extended periods of time. However, less is known with respect to the effect of Ca2+ channel antagonist on their receptors. The purpose of this study was to determine if chronic administration of high dosages of verapamil (in the toxic range) could alter the density of Ca2+ channels in the heart as determined by [3H]PN 200-110 binding. A range of high verapamil concentrations was administered to rats via s.c. implantable slow-release pellets or s.c. injection. An increasing rate of mortality was observed as the dose of verapamil administered increased. Quantitation of serum verapamil concentrations demonstrated that the s.c. slow release implantable pellets were not releasing the drug evenly and instead released toxic quantities of drug during the first 24 h after implantation. Serum verapamil levels determined from verapamil-injected animals demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in circulating levels. No significant alterations in Ca2+ channel characteristics (Bmax and Kd) were noted in cardiac tissue obtained from either treatment regime. Our results demonstrate that implantable pellets are not a reliable administration method for verapamil and cardiac Ca2+ channels are unusually resistant to biochemical alterations even after administration of verapamil dosages in the toxic range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".