MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014732313 · doi:10.1086/444498

Infrared Properties of Star-forming Dwarf Galaxies. I. Dwarf Irregular Galaxies in the Local Volume

2005· article· en· W2014732313 on OpenAlexaff
O. Văduvescu, M. L. McCall, M. G. Richer, Robin L. Fingerhut

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsSurface brightnessGalaxyAstronomyStar formationPopulationDwarf galaxyStellar populationStarsFlux (metallurgy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sample of 34 dwarf irregular galaxies in the Local Volume, most nearer than 5 Mpc, has been imaged in the near-infrared (NIR) in J and K_s at CFHT in Hawaii and OAN-SPM in Mexico. In CFHT images, stars brighter than M_Ks=-7.5 were resolved. In most cases, the resolved population represents less than 5% of the total NIR flux in K_s. Although exponential at large radii, surface brightness profiles for the unresolved component flatten in the centres. They can be fitted across the whole range of radii with a hyperbolic secant (sech) defined as a function of two parameters: the central surface brightness and the scale length of the exponential. Isophotal, total, and fitted sech magnitudes have been calculated for all galaxies for which the unresolved component was detected, along with semimajor axes. The scale length and the semimajor axes correlate linearly with absolute isophotal magnitude. The same is true for colors and the central brightness. More luminous dIs tend to be larger, redder and brighter in the centre. The Tully-Fisher relation shows considerable scatter, but residuals are tied to surface brightness. The galaxies appear to lie in a ``fundamental plane'' defined by the sech absolute magnitude, the sech central surface brightness, and the HI line-width. The rms of residuals in M_K is only 0.4 mag, which implies that the plane can be used to evaluate the distances of star-forming dwarfs. Color-magnitude diagrams are presented for 29 galaxies in which stars were resolved. Most show a finger centered around J-K_s=1 mag. In some cases, there is a red tail extending to J-K_s=2.5 mag. (Abstract slightly shortened).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207