MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014735960 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2014-0583

Preparation, electrochemical behavior, and variable-temperature magnetic properties of Co(3,5-DBSQ)<sub>2</sub> complexes of imidazole- or pyrazole-substituted ligands

2015· article· en· W2014735960 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Carolyn Dowling, D. R. Dinsdale, Martin T. Lemaire

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPyrazoleImidazoleTautomerBimetallic stripMagnetic susceptibilityValence (chemistry)Density functional theoryBenzimidazoleCrystallographyElectrochemistrySpin statesComputational chemistryPhysical chemistryInorganic chemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistryMetal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herein we describe the preparation of four new Co(3,5-DBSQ) 2 containing known 2-(2-pyridyl)benzimidazole 1, 2,2′-bisbenzimidazole 2, or 2,2-(1H-pyrazole-3,5-diyl)dipyridine 3. We investigate the electronic and variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility properties of these complexes. Complexes containing 2 and 3 are bimetallic and variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility data suggest observation of a stable intermediate (high-spin and low-spin) state for the bimetallic complex with 3, which does undergo valence tautomerism. Complexes 4–6 containing imidazole-based ligands 1 and 2 feature high-spin ground states and no valence tautomerism is observed in these materials. This experimental finding is corroborated with density functional theory calculations, which support the existence of a stable high-spin ground state in these complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMagnetism in coordination complexesFrench-language works237,207