MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014745447 · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e31817e1d11

Age- and Pathology-Specific Measures of Disc Degeneration

2008· article· en· W2014745447 on OpenAlexaff
Tapio Videman, Laura E. Gibbons, Michele C. Battié

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
KeywordsMedicineSagittal planeMagnetic resonance imagingIntervertebral discDegeneration (medical)PopulationLumbarPathologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: : A measurement study. OBJECTIVE: : To develop more accurate and specific measures of disc degeneration, which could better capture and distinguish systemic effects of aging and isolated disc irregularities using routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to examine their construct validity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: : Knowledge of the etiopathogenesis of disc degeneration and pathology is fundamental to advancements in common spinal disorders. The quality of measures of disc degeneration is currently limited progress in this area. METHODS: : Subjects were 519 twins, 35 to 70 years old, from a population-based cohort. Lumbar structures were traced and image software measured selected disc areas and T2 signal parameters of sagittal and axial images of lumbar spine with 1.5 Tesla MRI scanners. All signal measures were adjusted by adjacent cerebrospinal fluid signal. The mean adjusted disc signal, its standard deviation, and an irregularity measure were used to estimate the overall desiccation stage and signal variation across the disc. Associations with risk factors were examined to support or refute measurement validity. RESULTS: : The signal-based measures introduced were highly reproducible (inter-rater reliability ICC = 0.95-1.00). Age explained more of the signal-based disc measures (AR2 = 16%-32%) than did the qualitative measures of disc degeneration in common use (AR2 = 3%-8%) in L1-L4 discs, supporting the validity of the new measures. The signal-based measures were also more highly associated with physical loading and familial aggregation, further supporting their validity. Age and physical loading had higher associations with the sagittal than the axial measures and with upper rather than lower lumbar discs. Adjustment of signal-based measures by cerebrospinal fluid is critical and increased the associations between age and the measures by 2- to 10-fold. CONCLUSION: : The new signal-based measures show promise in their potential to better capture and perhaps distinguish aspects of disc degeneration than current assessment methods using standard MRI. Their use may enhance research on potential determinants of disc degeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207