MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014798101 · doi:10.1086/671074

Gone with the Trees: Deciphering the Thar Desert’s Recurring Droughts

2013· article· en· W2014798101 on OpenAlexaff
Karine Gagné

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Anthropology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Governance and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesert (philosophy)GeographyClimate changeEnvironmental historyEthnographyArticulation (sociology)Environmental resource managementSocioeconomicsSociologyHistoryEcologyArchaeologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the 10-year period between 1999 and 2009, the district of Barmer, located in the Marwar region of Rajasthan, India, experienced 7 years of rainfall deficits, as well as instances of excessive rainfall. This increased variability in rainfall patterns in an area largely covered by the Thar Desert ‘has exacerbated the region’s already precarious environmental and land conditions. This article is based on ethnographic research conducted in this part of India, which is impacted by the numerous social, economic, and environmental outcomes of successive extreme weather events. It discusses the transformation of the ecosystem of the Thar Desert by drawing the outlines of the recent environmental history and by exposing local farmers’ articulation of these changes. The meanings and subjectivities with which rural Rajasthan is endowed and which constitute farmers’ identity are also addressed through the examination of the cultural construction of place. The analysis reveals that people’s understanding of environmental change is intertwined with their broader worldview and their relationship with the elements that compose their immediate landscape. The author argues that a comprehensive understanding of the impact of climate change can only be reached by according more attention to the cultural dimensions of places.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.013
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent AnthropologySame topicWater Governance and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207