MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014817846 · doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0161

Dietary Cation Anion Difference of Five Cool‐Season Grasses

2006· article· en· W2014817846 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Gaëtan F. Tremblay, Hélène Brassard, Gilles Bélanger, Philippe Séguin, R. Drapeau, A. Brégard, R. Michaud, Guy Allard

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMcGill UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsDactylis glomerataFestuca arundinaceaPhleumBromus inermisForageAgronomyAnimal scienceDry matterBromusTiller (botany)GrazingChemistryBiologyPoaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forage‐based rations with a low dietary cation anion difference (DCAD) should be fed to dairy cows 2 to 4 wk prepartum to prevent hypocalcaemia or milk fever. We evaluated the DCAD of two to four cultivars of five grass species at three locations in Québec, Canada. Orchardgrass ( Dactylis glomerata L.), meadow bromegrass ( Bromus riparius Rehmann), tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), smooth bromegrass ( Bromus inermis Leyss.), and timothy ( Phleum pratense L.) were harvested twice a year during two production years. Forage mineral concentrations were measured and the DCAD was calculated with a short equation [DCAD S = (Na + + K + ) − (Cl − + S 2− )], and a long equation [DCAD L = (Na + + K + + 0.15Ca 2+ + 0.15Mg 2+ ) − (Cl − + 0.6S 2− + 0.5P 3− ). The five species had, respectively, DCAD S of 656, 540, 510, 490, and 384 mmol c kg −1 DM (dry matter) in spring growth, and 633, 569, 496, 447, and 332 mmol c kg −1 DM in summer regrowth. Orchardgrass had the highest DCAD and timothy the lowest while the three other species were intermediate in both spring growth and summer regrowth. Species differences in DCAD were primarily related to differences in K concentration. Timothy was the only species that decreased significantly in DCAD S (by 52 mmol c kg −1 DM) and DCAD L (by 35 mmol c kg −1 DM) from spring growth to summer regrowth. Cultivars did not differ in DCAD S and DCAD L except for tall fescue. Locations did not differ in DCAD. Among the grass species in this study, and because of its low DCAD, timothy is the best suited for producing forages fed to dairy cows in the weeks preceding calving.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgronomy JournalSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207