Activity Patterns of Canadian Women: Application of ClustalG Sequence Alignment Software
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sequence alignment procedures and a new software package for creating multiple sequence alignments, called ClustalG, are described and used to identify the activity patterns of Canadian women. ClustalG eliminates the constraint on the size of the event classification system implemented in software developed for biological applications, and this feature allows an analysis of activity sequences in conjunction with their settings, in this example, location and the presence of other people. Work, weekend days, age, marital status, and the presence of children relate to membership in different activity-pattern groups. The addition of data on activity setting to the sequences changes the discriminatory power of the analysis. When the analysis omits settings, the daily activities of elderly women are grouped with weekend activities of younger, family-raising women. Inclusion of settings identifies the activities of elderly women largely on the basis of location at home and isolation from other people. ClustalG is freely available over the Internet at www.stmarys.ca/partners/iatur/clustalG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it