Substrate-assisted Catalysis in the Aminoacyl Transfer Mechanism of Histidyl−tRNA Synthetase: A Density Functional Theory Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Density functional theory methods have been used to investigate possible mechanisms of the second half-reaction of aminoacylation catalyzed by histidyl-tRNA synthetase: transfer of the aminoacyl moiety from histidyl-adenylate to the terminal adenosine (A76) of tRNA. The properties of the two mechanistically important nonbridging phosphate oxygens of the histidyl-adenylate in the substrate-bound complex were first considered. It is found that the nonbridging pro-S oxygen is slightly more basic than the pro-R oxygen due to the fact that the former is involved in a weaker hydrogen bonding network than the latter. Three possible mechanisms in which the proton of the 3'-OH group of A76 transfers to the bridging phosphate oxygen and the nonbridging pro-R and -S oxygens were then investigated. When the bridging phosphate oxygen acts as the base, the reaction occurs via a four-membered ring transition structure with a considerably high barrier. When the pro-R oxygen acts as the base, a concerted mechanism was again found. However, it proceeds via a six-membered ring transition structure. In contrast, when the pro-S oxygen acts as a base, an associative stepwise mechanism was found which, furthermore, also had the lowest barrier of the three mechanisms obtained. Comparisons of these three mechanisms and reasons for the differences in barriers are also provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".