Microwave Photonic Link With Improved Dynamic Range Using a Polarization Modulator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A microwave photonic link (MPL) using a single polarization modulator (PolM) with an improved spurious free dynamic range (SFDR) is proposed and experimentally demonstrated. The proposed MPL is designed based on the destructive combination of the distortion signals in the electrical domain, which is realized using a PolM with its output split into two channels. In the upper channel, the PolM, a polarization controller (PC), and a polarization beam splitter (PBS) form an equivalent Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) that is biased at the quadrature point. The optical carrier is suppressed using a phase-shifted fiber Bragg grating (PS-FBG). In the lower channel, the PolM, another PC, and the PBS form a second equivalent MZM that is also biased at the quadrature point but at the opposite slope of the transfer function. The signals from the two channels are sent to a photodetector (PD). If the optical powers into the two channels are identical, the third-order intermodulation terms are completely suppressed. An experiment is performed. An enhancement in SFDR of 10 dB is achieved. The insertion loss of the proposed MPL is also estimated, which is 9.5 dB smaller than a phase modulator based MPL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".