MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014862477 · doi:10.1080/15422110701873098

Part III: Supercritical Fluid Chromatographic Separations

2008· article· en· W2014862477 on OpenAlexaff
Guy Félix, Alain Berthod, Patrick Piras, Christian Roussel

Bibliographic record

VenueSeparation and Purification Reviews · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsCegep de Saint Jerome
FundersUniversité de LyonCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsSupercritical fluid chromatographySupercritical fluidEnantiomerChemistryChromatographyChiral stationary phaseOrganic chemistryHigh-performance liquid chromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The enantioseparation of 123 clinically used racemic drugs by supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) on commercial chiral stationary phases (CSPs) available in 2006 is reviewed. The CSPs were briefly described in Part I of this work. The mobile phase compositions, with organic modifier and additives, are listed. The data was extracted and compiled from the ChirBase database (Marseille, France). All the drugs included are listed according to the thirteen therapeutic classes of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification. It is evident that the nature of the SF mobile phase precludes the use of several classes of CSPs such as the crown ethers, ligand‐exchange or protein‐based CSPs. The polysaccharide based CSPs were responsible for two third of the enantiomer separation listed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeparation and Purification ReviewsSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207