MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014924227 · doi:10.1029/2004ja010987

Quasi‐periodic backscatters from the <i>E</i> region at Gadanki: Evidence for Kelvin‐Helmholtz billows in the lower thermosphere?

2005· article· en· W2014924227 on OpenAlexaff
R. K. Choudhary, L. M. Kagan, K. K. Mahajan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGeologyGeophysicsRadarDoppler effectVortexComputational physicsMechanicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analyzing the field‐aligned coherent radar backscatter observed over Gadanki, India (13.5°N, 79.2°E), with a narrow beam pointing almost vertically, we present convincing experimental evidence for the presence of low‐latitudes tilted sporadic ionization layers close to 10 km in vertical extent that move horizontally through the field of view of the radar. Using the data from high temporal (∼3 s) resolution experiments, we also show that the line‐of‐sight Doppler velocities associated with at least some of the quasi‐periodic striations have very clear vortex‐like structures cutting across a vertical plane inside regions of strong horizontal wind shears. The power as well as the Doppler width peak together, and they often reach their peak values near the center of a vortex, where the magnitude of the Doppler velocity is minimum. The Doppler properties and spatial distribution of the 3 m echoes are explained in terms of a local electrodynamical process that makes ions and electrons move with the vertical neutral wind. Both the wind field and the tilt of the layers are in turn consistent with the presence of Kelvin‐Helmholtz billows. We postulate that the billows themselves are triggered by a shear instability in the large ambient zonal wind; strong zonal wind shears clearly have to be present when sporadic E layers are observed. In our case, the breaking of an originally uniform and horizontal sporadic E layer into tilted pieces aligned more or less parallel to one another, and their motion through the radar field of view in the presence of a mean zonal wind, give the echoes their quasi‐periodic appearance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207