MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014966522 · doi:10.1002/cne.20033

Human cardiovascular and gustatory brainstem sites observed by functional magnetic resonance imaging

2004· article· en· W2014966522 on OpenAlexaff
Jane Topolovec‐Vranic, Joseph S. Gati, Ravi S. Menon, J. Kevin Shoemaker, David F. Cechetto

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Comparative Neurology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrainstemFunctional magnetic resonance imagingNeuroscienceSensory systemPeriaqueductal grayAnatomyBiologySolitary tractReflexHypoglossal nucleusSolitary nucleusNucleusCentral nervous systemMidbrain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reflex control and relay to higher brain sites of visceral sensory information within the central nervous system is mediated via discrete sites in the brainstem. Anatomical characterization of these sites in humans has been limited due to the invasive nature of such research. The present study employed 4 Tesla functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to characterize brainstem sites involved in autonomic control in the human. Eight subjects performed tasks that activate the general visceral (the isometric hand-grip, maximal inspiration, Valsalva maneuver) or special visceral sensory systems (sucrose administration to the tongue). Activation of the nucleus of the solitary tract and parabrachial nucleus was consistently observed with all general visceral tasks. Periaqueductal gray area activation was observed during the maximal inspiration and Valsalva maneuver conditions and raphe activation was present in response to isometric hand-grip and maximal inspiration tasks. The activation in the nucleus of the solitary tract was consistently more rostral in the medulla during sucrose administration than during performance of the other experimental tasks. This finding is consistent with what has been previously demonstrated in animals. This is the first study to image the human brainstem with respect to visceral control and demonstrates the feasibility of using high-resolution fMRI to study the functional organization of the human brainstem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Comparative NeurologySame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207