Tissue-Specific and Substrate-Specific Endoproteolytic Cleavage of Monkey Pro-Opiomelanocortin in Heterologous Endocrine Cells: Processing at Lys-Lys Dibasic Pairs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study compares the processing of pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) at two Lys-Lys cleavage sites, located in the carboxy-terminal domain of the precursor, one site marking the amino terminus of beta-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (beta-MSH) and the other in the carboxy-terminus of beta-endorphin (beta E). These comparisons were carried out by transfecting monkey POMC cDNA into two heterologous cell lines: AtT-20, which endogenously expresses mouse POMC, and Rin m5F, which has been previously used as a host for transfected POMC. These cells lines are known to process POMC differently at Lys-Arg residues, though less is known about their Lys-Lys cleavage. Our results have demonstrated both tissue-specific and site-specific factors controlling Lys-Lys cleavage. The AtT-20 line appears not to perform either Lys-Lys cleavage. Rin m5F cells, on the other hand, fail to process the site at the carboxy terminus of beta E (beta E28-29) but do process, to a significant extent, the N-terminal site to beta-MSH. That this differential processing is unlikely to be due to a POMC conformation which would make the beta E site inaccessible was demonstrated by mutating the sites from Lys-Lys to Lys-Arg. With such mutants, Rin m5F cells fully processed at both locations. Interestingly, the mutant Lys-Arg sites were not fully processed by AtT-20 cells. These results are discussed in terms of the complement of processing enzymes expressed in each of the cell lines, as well as the role of residues surrounding the diabasic cleavage sites in determining the likelihood of proteolysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".