Visuomotor Integration Is Compromised in Alzheimer’s Disease Patients Reaching for Remembered Targets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined the ability of neurologically healthy individuals and individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) to successfully complete procedures involving short-term spatial visuomotor memory tasks, and tasks involving increasingly complex visuomotor transformations. Participants made sliding finger movements over a clear touch-sensitive screen on two separate spatial planes (vertical and horizontal), to visually constant and remembered target positions. Significant main effects were observed between participant groups on reaction time and movement time measures. As well, significant changes in reaction time and movement time were observed within the patient group over the different of any experimental procedures. In addition, as task increased in complexity significant increases in errors were observed in the AD group. Overall, the results reveal that AD patients show substantial declines in their ability to process and integrate visual information to produce motor responses. Therefore, we believe that this psychophysical research provides further evidence that AD, even early stages of AD, can affect anatomical regions supporting vision for action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it