Gas-Phase Kinetic Measurements of the Ligation of Ni <sup>+</sup> , Cu <sup>+</sup> , Ni(Pyrrole) <sub>1,2</sub> <sup>+</sup> and Cu(Pyrrole) <sub>1,2</sub> <sup>+</sup> with CO <sub>2</sub> , D <sub>2</sub> O, NH <sub>3</sub> and NO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rate and equilibrium kinetics of the reactions of the biologically important metal species M(+), M(+)(pyrrole) and M(+)(pyrrole)(2) (M = Ni, Cu) have been investigated with the biological gases CO(2), D(2)O, NH(3) and NO in the gas phase at 295 +/- 2 K in helium buffer-gas at a pressure of 0.35 +/- 0.01 Torr. The measurements were taken with an Inductively Coupled Plasma/Selected-Ion Flow Tube (ICP/SIFT) tandem mass spectrometer. Only ligation was observed for the reactions of bare Ni(+) and Cu(+) with CO(2), D(2)O and NH(3) with rates consistent with the known strengths of the resulting ligand-metal bonds. Both metal cations appeared to be oxidized and produce N(2)O in interesting reactions that are second order in NO. One pyrrole ligand was observed to increase the rate of ligation by as much as a factor of 100 and to switch off the oxidation with NO. Equilibrium was achieved for the ligation of CO(2), D(2)O and NO to both Ni(+)(pyrrole) and Cu(+)(pyrrole), and so it was possible to determine absolute values for the standard free energies of ligation. No ligand substitution was observed with M(+)(pyrrole). M(+)(pyrrole)(2) was observed to be generally unreactive towards the small molecules investigated: a notable exception is ammonia. Very fast ligand substitution reactions were observed for reactions of M(+)(pyrrole)(2) with NH(2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".