MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015006635 · doi:10.1255/ejms.694

Gas-Phase Kinetic Measurements of the Ligation of Ni <sup>+</sup> , Cu <sup>+</sup> , Ni(Pyrrole) <sub>1,2</sub> <sup>+</sup> and Cu(Pyrrole) <sub>1,2</sub> <sup>+</sup> with CO <sub>2</sub> , D <sub>2</sub> O, NH <sub>3</sub> and NO

2004· article· en· W2015006635 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael J. Y. Jarvis, Voislav Blagojevic, Gregory K. Koyanagi, Diethard K. Böhme

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Mass Spectrometry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersLuonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen ToimikuntaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPyrroleChemistryLigand (biochemistry)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Inorganic chemistryCrystallographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rate and equilibrium kinetics of the reactions of the biologically important metal species M(+), M(+)(pyrrole) and M(+)(pyrrole)(2) (M = Ni, Cu) have been investigated with the biological gases CO(2), D(2)O, NH(3) and NO in the gas phase at 295 +/- 2 K in helium buffer-gas at a pressure of 0.35 +/- 0.01 Torr. The measurements were taken with an Inductively Coupled Plasma/Selected-Ion Flow Tube (ICP/SIFT) tandem mass spectrometer. Only ligation was observed for the reactions of bare Ni(+) and Cu(+) with CO(2), D(2)O and NH(3) with rates consistent with the known strengths of the resulting ligand-metal bonds. Both metal cations appeared to be oxidized and produce N(2)O in interesting reactions that are second order in NO. One pyrrole ligand was observed to increase the rate of ligation by as much as a factor of 100 and to switch off the oxidation with NO. Equilibrium was achieved for the ligation of CO(2), D(2)O and NO to both Ni(+)(pyrrole) and Cu(+)(pyrrole), and so it was possible to determine absolute values for the standard free energies of ligation. No ligand substitution was observed with M(+)(pyrrole). M(+)(pyrrole)(2) was observed to be generally unreactive towards the small molecules investigated: a notable exception is ammonia. Very fast ligand substitution reactions were observed for reactions of M(+)(pyrrole)(2) with NH(2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Mass SpectrometrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207