Equations of state for polyamide‐6 and its nanocomposites. 1. Fundamentals and the matrix
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The pressure‐volume‐temperature ( PVT ) surface of polyamide‐6 (PA‐6) was determined in the range of temperature T = 300–600 K and pressure P = 0.1–190 MPa. The data were analyzed separately for the molten and the noncrystalline phase using the Simha‐Somcynsky (S‐S) equation of state (eos) based on the cell‐hole theory. At T g ( P ) ≤ T ≤ T m ( P ), the “solid” state comprises liquid phase with crystals dispersed in it. The PVT behavior of the latter phase was described using Midha‐Nanda‐Simha‐Jain (MNSJ) eos based on the cell theory. The data fitting to these two theories yielded two sets of the Lennard‐Jones interaction parameters: ε*(S‐S) = 34.0 ± 0.3 and ε*(MNSJ) = 22.8 ± 0.3 kJ/mol, whereas v *(S‐S) = 32.00 ± 0.1 and v *(MNSJ) = 27.9 ± 0.2 mL/mol. The raw PVT data were numerically differentiated to obtain the thermal expansion and compressibility coefficients, α and κ, respectively. At constant P , κ followed the same dependence on both sides of the melting zone near T m . By contrast, α = α( T ) dependencies were dramatically different for the solid and molten phase; at T < T m , α linearly increased with increasing T , then within the melting zone, its value step‐wise decreased, to slowly increase at higher temperatures. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 47: 299–313, 2009
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it