Effects of substorm dynamics on magnetic signatures of the ionospheric Alfvén resonator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spectral resonance structures (SRS) of the ionospheric Alfvén resonator (IAR) measured by the induction magnetometer at the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) ionospheric observatory during a substorm on 28 February 2006 are presented. The evolution of IAR SRS is compared to ionospheric parameters measured by the colocated Digisonde, riometer and all‐sky imager at HAARP. Initially, the magnetic IAR signatures (spectral resonance structures) exhibited an expected variation that can be attributed to typical diurnal changes in ionospheric structure. At substorm onset, the signatures disappeared because of either a suppression of resonance conditions by substorm‐related particle precipitation or enhanced power in the Pc1 spectrum that concealed continuing IAR SRS. After the substorm, the SRS reappeared; however the harmonics had shifted to lower frequencies with tighter frequency spacing. For the first time, we show that this time‐dependent behavior in IAR SRS is explained by increased F region densities resulting from electron precipitation. Similarities between observed IAR harmonic frequencies and those calculated with a model suggest that variations in F region density, especially f o F 2 , may often dominate the evolution of IAR eigenfrequencies. This could potentially provide a mechanism for monitoring topside dynamics using IAR SRS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".