MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015040553 · doi:10.1080/07011784.2013.801599

Hazus: A standardized methodology for flood risk assessment in Canada

2013· article· en· W2015040553 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNatural Resources CanadaFederal Emergency Management AgencyPublic Safety Canada
KeywordsRisk assessmentAgency (philosophy)Flood mythGovernment (linguistics)Natural hazardHazardRisk managementNatural disasterVariety (cybernetics)Environmental planningFlooding (psychology)Risk analysis (engineering)BusinessEmergency managementEnvironmental resource managementEngineeringComputer scienceGeographyPolitical scienceEnvironmental scienceComputer securityFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While Canada is exposed to a variety of natural hazards, most risk and emergency managers presently lack the necessary tools and guidance to adequately undertake rigorous risk assessments.Recently, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) has adopted Hazus, a standardized methodology for estimating potential losses from natural hazards developed by the US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA, fema.gov/hazus) as one of the best practice methods for risk assessment.Hazus estimates potential losses from earthquakes, floods and hurricanes, and includes a hazard and inventory database needed to conduct baseline risk assessment studies.An agreement has been signed with FEMA to adapt and co-develop a harmonized North American version of the Hazus methodology.At the same time, collaboration has been initiated within the federal government between the departments of Natural Resources, Environment, Defence and Public Safety to promote widespread usage of Hazus among the full range of Canadian decision-makers.This article reports the typical features of the Canadian version of the Hazus flood module and summarizes ongoing activities and potential challenges in implementing this model in Canada.Bien que le Canada soit expos une varit de risques naturels, la plupart des gestionnaires de risques et d'urgence n'ont actuellement pas les outils ncessaires et les conseils pour bien entreprendre des valuations rigoureuses des risques.Rcemment, Ressources naturelles Canada (RNCan) a adopt Hazus, une mthodologie standardise pour estimer les pertes potentielles lis aux alas naturels mis au point par la US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA,fema.gov/Hazus),comme l'une des meilleures mthodes de pratiques pour l'valuation du risques.Hazus estime les pertes lies aux tremblements de terre, aux inondations et aux ouragans, et comprend une base de donnes inventoriant les alas essentiels ncessaires pour mener des tudes prliminaires d'valuation du risque.Un accord a t sign avec la FEMA pour adapter et pour co-dvelopper une version harmonise nord-amricaine de la mthodologie Hazus.En mme temps, la collaboration a t initie au sein du gouvernement fdral entre les ministres des Ressources naturelles, de l'Environnement, de la Dfense et de la Scurit publique pour promouvoir l'utilisation gnralise de Hazus parmi l'ensemble des dcideurs canadiens.Cet article prsente les caractristiques typiques de la

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it