Preferential Diaphragmatic Weakness during Sustained <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> Lung Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa plays a major role in the pulmonary inflammation and injury associated with cystic fibrosis. Lung inflammation may also lead to more widespread systemic effects on other organs. We tested the following hypotheses: (1) ongoing P. aeruginosa lung infection produces diaphragmatic and limb muscle weakness and (2) such muscle dysfunction is directly correlated with the level of pulmonary inflammation. Chronic bronchopulmonary infection with mucoid P. aeruginosa was induced in C57BL/6 mice. At Day 2 after infection, diaphragmatic force was decreased (37%) only in mice infected with a high dose of 1 x 10(6) cfu, whereas by Day 7 after infection, diaphragmatic force was similarly reduced (36%) even at a fivefold lower inoculating dose. No significant correlations were found between diaphragmatic weakness and pulmonary inflammation, as assessed by the number of neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Moreover, in marked contrast to the diaphragm, no effects of P. aeruginosa infection on contractile function were observed in prototypical slow- and fast-twitch hindlimb muscles. We conclude that sustained lung infection with P. aeruginosa induces preferential weakness of the diaphragm, which is not directly correlated with the degree of pulmonary inflammation induced under these conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".