Novel Dual-Grafted Copolymer Bearing Glassy Polystyrene and Crystalline Poly(Ethylene Oxide) as Side Chains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel grafted copolymer with two different types of side chains was synthesized via a combination of grafting-onto and grafting-from strategy. Graft copolymer with one side chains polybutadiene-graft-polystyrene (PB-g-PS) was first synthesized though the grafting-onto method. Following the subsequent grafting-from method, the second kind of side chain was introduced to the copolymer with anionic ring open polymerization of ethylene oxide, obtaining dual-grafted copolymer polybutadiene-graft-(polystyrene; poly(ethylene oxide)) (PB-g-(PS;PEO)). By this combined strategy, linear and star-shaped dual-grafted copolymer were synthesized. The resulting dual-grafted copolymers had controlled molecular weights and narrow molecular weight distributions (Mw/Mn < 1.20). The thermal behavior of this dual-grafted copolymer bearing glassy and crystalline side chains was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), revealing that poly(ethylene oxide) grafts underwent confined crystallization, and the star-shaped copolymer had more confinement effects than did the linear ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".