MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015053055 · doi:10.4141/a01-039

Hormonal response of pregnant gilts fed a high fiber or a concentrate diet once or twice daily

2002· article· en· W2015053055 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
C. Farmer, M. C. Meunier‐Salaün, Renée Bergeron, Suzanne Robert

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorningInternal medicineEndocrinologyMealGestationInsulinMedicineAnimal scienceArea under the curvePregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of fiber intake and feeding frequency on endocrine status were studied. Gilts were fed 2.2 kg d -1 of a concentrate diet (n = 6; 5.3% crude fiber) or 3.1 kg d -1 of a high-fiber diet (n = 7; 18.2% crude fiber) as of day 23 of gestation. For a 1-mo period, starting on day 60 of gestation, three or four animals within each dietary treatment received one daily ration at 0800 h while the others received two meals at 0800 and 1430 h. Feeding frequency was then reversed for the following 1-mo period. Jugular catheters were inserted on day 23 of each 1-mo period and serial blood samples were obtained from 0730 to 1630 h on day 25, to measure cortisol, insulin, glucose and free fatty acids (FFA). The mean of three samples obtained before the morning or afternoon mealtime was used to establish a preprandial baseline and samples thereafter were used to measure area under the curve (AUC) and maximal values. Fiber intake had no effect on any baseline values (P > 0.1), but decreased overall insulin AUC (P < 0.05) and glucose maximal values (P < 0.05) and increased morning FFA AUC (P < 0.05). Compared to one daily meal, twice daily feeding increased afternoon baseline cortisol (P < 0.05) and decreased morning cortisol AUC and baseline FFA (P < 0.001). It also increased afternoon insulin maximal values and AUC (P < 0.05) as well as morning and afternoon maximal glucose (P < 0.05) and decreased morning maximal FFA (P < 0.05). Insulin was the only variable affected by the fiber intake × number of meals interaction with twice daily feeding lowering morning maximal (P < 0.05) and AUC (P < 0.001) values in concentrate-fed gilts while not altering those values in gilts fed a high-fiber diet. Addition of fiber to the diet of pregnant gilts altered their hormonal response to meals, while once daily feeding created a post-absorptive state in the morning and increased cortisol concentrations postprandially. Key words: Gestation, pigs, fiber intake, feeding frequency, insulin, glucose

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207