Universal IED for distribution smart grids
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To satisfy customer's growing service quality expectations and to support, as well, a wide array of additional new services, utilities need to provide high quality power over a complex and interactive grid with greater reliability, efficiency and security. To achieve this complex task, they need to implement new technologies in their power systems, including accommodating distributed generation (DG) and integrating the latest information technologies (IT) including acquisition and communication. This paper presents a new concept of feeder level universal Intelligent Electronic Devices (IED), based on a modular structure, compatible with all major distribution equipments and complying with international standards. Characteristics like interoperability and plug-and-play offered by this IED as default standardized features will allow improvement in the efficiency of existing Smart Distribution applications and will open the gate for the development of new ones. The results of IREQ's project related to the concept and design of such IEDs and their implications are discussed in support of this vision. (4 pages)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it