Comminuted Talar Neck Fractures: A Mechanical Comparison of Fixation Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the mechanical performance of 3 fixation techniques for comminuted talar neck fractures. DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical study. SETTING: Bioengineering research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty previously frozen human cadaveric tali were osteotomized across the talar neck. A wedge of bone 2 cm long and extending 50% of the medial to lateral and superior to inferior dimension of the talus was removed to create an unstable, comminuted fracture. INTERVENTION: The specimens were randomized to one of 3 fixation groups. The first group was fixed with 3 anterior-to-posterior screws. The second group was fixed with 2 cannulated screws inserted from posterior to anterior. The third group was fixed with 1 screw from anterior to posterior and a medially applied blade plate. Specimens were embedded in acrylic cement and mounted on an Instron mechanical testing machine. Loading was applied in the dorsal-medial direction to failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For each specimen, the load-displacement curve, yield point, and 3 mm displacement point were recorded in response to controlled dorsal-medial loading to failure. Stiffness was calculated as the linear portion of the slope of the load (kN) versus displacement (mm) curve. Statistical analysis of the data was conducted using analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean yield point of each of the fixation techniques tested exceeded 1.4 kN. No statistically significant difference was found between the fixation methods, even when variations in age and sex were considered. CONCLUSIONS: The mean yield point of the fixation techniques tested exceeds the theoretical stress across the talar neck during active motion. Anterior plate fixation provided equivalent stability to posterior screw fixation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".