MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015179401 · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0923

The Association between the Anti-inflammatory Protein CC10 and Smoking Status among Participants in a Chemoprevention Trial

2007· article· en· W2015179401 on OpenAlex
Jiping Chen, Stephen Lam, Aprile L. Pilon, Annette McWilliams, James Melby, Éva Szabó

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMedicineBronchoalveolar lavageInternal medicineGastroenterologyLung cancerCigarette smokingSmoking cessationLungPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CC10, the secretory product of bronchiolar Clara cells, is infrequently expressed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and its overexpression in NSCLC cell lines results in a less malignant phenotype. CC10 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) and serum are significantly lower in current smokers than healthy nonsmokers, but the effect of long-term smoking cessation on CC10 is unknown. We measured CC10 in baseline BAL and plasma collected from current (n = 81) and former (n = 23) smokers participating in a chemoprevention trial. Former smokers had significantly higher plasma CC10 levels compared with current smokers [mean, 62.1 ng/mL (95% CI, 43.0-81.2); range, 23.0-175.0 ng/mL for former smokers; and mean, 37.1 ng/mL (95% CI, 29.8-44.4); range, 5.0-171.0 ng/mL for current smokers; P < 0.001]. BAL CC10 levels also trended in the same direction. A significant positive correlation was found between CC10 plasma and BAL levels. After adjustment for age, sex, and pack-years of cigarette consumption, former smokers had 1.70 (95% CI, 1.23-2.36) times higher plasma CC10 levels than current smokers (P < 0.01), whereas former smokers also had nonsignificantly higher baseline BAL CC10 levels compared with current smokers [adjusted mean ratio (95% CI), 1.60 (0.92-2.80), P = 0.094 and 1.35 (0.86-2.10), P = 0.193 for the absolute and normalized BAL CC10, respectively]. These results show that sustained smoking cessation is associated with higher plasma CC10 levels, suggesting that at least some of the damage associated with tobacco smoke may be repaired by long-term smoking cessation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it