Organoboron Compounds with an 8-Hydroxyquinolato Chelate and Its Derivatives: Substituent Effects on Structures and Luminescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four new luminescent organoboron complexes have been synthesized and fully characterized. These compounds are four-coordinate boron chelated by either 8-hydroxyquinolato (q) or functionalized 8-hydroxylquinolato ligands, including BPh2(5-(1-naphthyl)-q) (1), BPh2(5-(2-benzothienyl)-q) (2), B(2-benzothienyl)2q (3), and B(2-benzothienyl)2(2-Me-q) (4). All four compounds have a tetrahedral geometry as established by X-ray diffraction analyses. In solution, compounds 1-4 have an emission maximum at 534, 565, 501, and 496 nm, respectively, at room temperature. They emit similar colors in the solid states without red shifts of the emission band due to the lack of significant intermolecular interactions in the crystal lattices. The substituent group at C5 or C2 position of the 8-hydroxyquinolato ligand has been observed to have a significant impact on the emission energy and the emission quantum efficiency of the boron complexes. Molecular orbital calculations (Gaussian 98) showed that the electronic transition of 1 and 2 is a pi-pi* transition centered on the functionalized 8-hydroxyquinolato group and the electronic transition of 3 and 4 is an interligand charge transfer from the 2-benzothienyl ligand to the hydroxyquinolato ring. A double-layer electroluminescent device using 3 as the emitter has been fabricated, which produced a broad emission band with a significant contribution of exciplex emission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".