MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015207556 · doi:10.14309/crj.2014.42

White Ball Sign

2014· article· en· W2015207556 on OpenAlexaff
Callum Dargavel, Samir C. Grover

Bibliographic record

VenueACG Case Reports Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMelenaVarixVaricesLigationVaricose veinsEsophageal varicesSurgeryCirrhosisPortal hypertensionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Case Report An 81-year-old man with alcoholic cirrhosis presented with hematemesis, melena, and hypotension. Examination revealed ascites and chronic liver disease stigmata. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed multiple large columns of esophageal varices. No other bleeding sources were seen. Using a Cook 4, 6, 10 Shooter® (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) multi-band ligator, the varix was ligated at the site of a platelet plug, which suggested recent hemorrhage (Figure 1). After blood extruded at the site of this defect, the ligated varix demonstrated the white ball sign (Figure 2). First described by Matsutani and colleagues, the white ball sign is observed after effective variceal ligation at the bleeding site.1-3 It is hypothesized that the outflow of blood from the rupture point on the varix is the likely cause of this phenomenon.1-3 Ligation at non-bleeding sites results in a purple ball appearance, representing congestion of blood in the variceal vessels captured by the band.3 Other authors have noted that the white ball sign also occurs with ligation of the bleeding point on esophogogastric varices.3 In the setting of variceal bleeding where the bleeding point is obscure, the white ball sign is particularly useful in confirming effective ligation.1Figure 1.: Appearance of varix after ligation with a Cook 4, 6, 10 Shooter® multi-band ligator suggesting recent hemorrhage.Figure 2.: The ligated varix demonstrated the white ball sign after blood extruded at the site of this defect.Disclosures Author contributions: C. Dargavel wrote the manuscript and, along with SC Grover, revised the manuscript for intellectually important content. SC Grover obtained the endoscopic images, approved the final manuscript, and is the article guarantor. Financial disclosure: None to report. Informed consent was obtained for this case report. Received: December 2, 2013; Accepted: March 18, 2014

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACG Case Reports JournalSame topicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207