MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015224581 · doi:10.1115/es2007-36084

Iran’s Seas and Lakes Sustainable Energy Potential

2007· article· en· W2015224581 on OpenAlex
Farshid Zabihian

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 2007 Energy Sustainability Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep ocean waterOceanographyCurrent (fluid)Energy currentSalinityThermal energyOcean currentGeologyEnvironmental scienceMarine energyWater massEnergy fluxEnergy (signal processing)Seawater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this paper is to study the positions and features of the boundary and domestic seas and lakes of Iran and possibility of using these energy sources and proposed approaches to do so. Generally the potential energies in the seas and oceans are classified in five groups, which are: wave energy, tidal energy, ocean thermal energy, ocean current energy, and salinity gradient energy. Regarding the variety of the country’s bodies of water other than ocean current energy it is possible to use rest of these energy resources. Each bodies of water of Iran are suitable for specific kind of seas energies. There are great sources of tidal energy in Persian Gulf coasts especially in west side of it. For thermal energy the ideal sites are located in the Caspian Sea coasts and wave energy can economically be extracted in Gulf of Oman coasts, especially in remote islands which are not connected to the grid. Finally, the Urmia Lake is best location for salinity gradient energy. This study shows that more investment is required in this area for research and small scale plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it