MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015228775 · doi:10.4319/lo.2014.59.5.1555

Seasonal rates of benthic primary production in a Greenland fjord measured by aquatic eddy correlation

2014· article· en· W2015228775 on OpenAlexaff
Karl M. Attard, Ronnie N. Glud, Daniel F. McGinnis, Søren Rysgaard

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsFjordOceanographyBenthic zoneEnvironmental sciencePrimary (astronomy)GeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the first year‐round estimates of benthic primary production at four contrasting shallow (3–22 m depth) benthic habitats in a southwest Greenland fjord. In situ measurements were performed using the noninvasive aquatic eddy‐correlation (EC) oxygen (O 2 ) flux method. A series of high‐quality multiple‐day EC data sets document the presence of a year‐round productive benthic phototrophic community. The shallow‐water sites were on average autotrophic during the spring and summer months, up to 43.6 mmol O 2 m −2 d −1 , and heterotrophic or close to metabolic balance during the autumn and winter. Substantial benthic gross primary production (GPP) was measured year‐round. The highest GPP rates were measured during the spring, up to 5.7 mmol O 2 m −2 h −1 (136.8 mmol O 2 m −2 d −1 ), and even at low light levels (< 80 µmol quanta m −2 s −1 ) during late autumn and winter we measured rates of up to 1.8 mmol O 2 m −2 h −1 (43.2 mmol O 2 m −2 d −1 ) during peak irradiance. The benthic phototrophic communities responded seasonally to ambient light levels and exhibited year‐round high photosynthetic efficiency. In situ downwelling irradiances as low as ∼ 2 µmol quanta m −2 s −1 induced an autotrophic response and light saturation indices ( I k ) were as low as 11 µmol quanta m −2 s −1 in the winter. On an annual timescale, the average areal rate of benthic GPP was 11.5 mol O 2 m −2 yr −1 , which is ∼ 1.4 times higher than the integrated gross pelagic primary production of the ∼ 30–50 m deep photic zone of the fjord. These results document the importance of benthic photosynthesis on an ecosystem level and indicate that the benthic phototrophic compartment should be accounted for when assessing carbon and nutrient budgets as well as responses of coastal Arctic ecosystems to climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and OceanographySame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207