Regulation of EGF‐Stimulated EGF Receptor Endocytosis During M Phase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been generally accepted that endocytosis is inhibited during mitotic phase (M phase) as a means to insulate the cell from outside influences. Many endocytic/trafficking proteins are present during M phase, but are associated with partners that are distinct from those involved in trafficking pathways. These findings have led to the 'moonlighting' hypothesis. However, all these findings are based on the study of fluid-phase and constitutive endocytosis. Here, we used epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a model system to study ligand-induced receptor endocytosis in M phase. We found that EGF-induced EGFR endocytosis still occurs during M phase, but follows different kinetics. EGF-induced EGFR endocytosis is delayed/inhibited for a few minutes and is slower in M phase, especially at metaphase. However, consistent with previous reports, transferrin endocytosis is inhibited under the same conditions. We further showed that EGFR endocytosis is differentially regulated during the cell cycle: dependent on EGFR kinase activation in M phase, but independent of EGFR kinase activation in interphase. We conclude that cells have adopted a system for selective endocytosis in M phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".