Regulation of EGF‐Stimulated EGF Receptor Endocytosis During M Phase
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been generally accepted that endocytosis is inhibited during mitotic phase (M phase) as a means to insulate the cell from outside influences. Many endocytic/trafficking proteins are present during M phase, but are associated with partners that are distinct from those involved in trafficking pathways. These findings have led to the 'moonlighting' hypothesis. However, all these findings are based on the study of fluid-phase and constitutive endocytosis. Here, we used epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a model system to study ligand-induced receptor endocytosis in M phase. We found that EGF-induced EGFR endocytosis still occurs during M phase, but follows different kinetics. EGF-induced EGFR endocytosis is delayed/inhibited for a few minutes and is slower in M phase, especially at metaphase. However, consistent with previous reports, transferrin endocytosis is inhibited under the same conditions. We further showed that EGFR endocytosis is differentially regulated during the cell cycle: dependent on EGFR kinase activation in M phase, but independent of EGFR kinase activation in interphase. We conclude that cells have adopted a system for selective endocytosis in M phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it