MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015277191 · doi:10.1021/ja027976r

Reactivity of Intermediates in Benzoylformate Decarboxylase:  Avoiding the Path to Destruction

2002· article· en· W2015277191 on OpenAlexaff
Qingyan Hu, Ronald Kluger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical Acid Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCarbanionDecarboxylationBenzaldehydeReactivity (psychology)EnamineProtonationCofactorEnzymeEnzyme catalysisStereochemistryOrganic chemistryMedicinal chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Benzoylformate decarboxylase forms a covalent intermediate from thiamin diphosphate (TDP) and benzoylformate, alpha-mandelylTDP. This loses carbon dioxide to form a carbanion (enamine). Protonation of the carbanion and elimination of benzaldehyde regenerate enzyme-bound TDP. We synthesized alpha-mandelylthiamin and found that the rate of the loss of carbon dioxide is one-millionth that of the enzymic reaction. Thus, the enzyme provides an environment that facilitates the unimolecular decarboxylation process. However, the resulting nonenzymic carbanion reacts very rapidly to give products that lead to the irreversible destruction of the cofactor. This contrasts with the normal process on the enzyme. Brønsted acids on the enzyme may divert the reaction to the benzaldehyde precursor, or the enzyme may block access to the pathway that leads to destruction of the cofactor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicBiochemical Acid Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207