Characterization of a 150 kDa accessory receptor for TGF‐β1 on keratinocytes: Direct evidence for a GPI anchor and ligand binding of the released form
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) is a key modulator of epidermal development and homeostasis, and has been shown to potently regulate keratinocyte migration and function during wound repair. There are three cloned TGF-beta receptors termed type I, type II, and type III that are found on most cell types. The types I and II are the signaling receptors, while the type III is believed to facilitate TGF-beta binding to the types I and II receptors. Recently, we reported that in addition to these receptors, human keratinocytes express a 150 kDa TGF-beta 1 binding protein (r150) which forms a heteromeric complex with the TGF-beta signaling receptors. This accessory receptor was described as glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-specific anchored based on its sensitivity to phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C (PIPLC). In the present study, we demonstrate that the GPI-anchor is contained in r150 itself and not on a tightly associated protein and that it binds TGF-beta 1 with an affinity similar to those of the types I and II TGF-beta signaling receptors. Furthermore, the PIPLC released (soluble) form of this protein is capable of binding TGF-beta 1 independently from the signaling receptors. In addition, we provide evidence that r150 is released from the cell surface by an endogenous phospholipase C. Our observation that r150 interacts with the TGF-beta signaling receptors, together with the finding that the soluble r150 binds TGF-beta 1 suggest that r150 in either its membrane anchored or soluble form may potentiate or antagonize TGF-beta signaling. Elucidating the mechanism by which r150 functions as an accessory molecule in TGF-beta signaling may be critical to understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of TGF-beta action in keratinocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".