Biophysical defects in voltage-gated sodium channels associated with Long QT and Brugada syndromes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The activity of voltage-gated sodium channels contributes to onset and duration of the cardiac action potential through an intricate balance with the activity of other ion channels. Activation of sodium channels leads to membrane depolarization and Phase 0 of the cardiac action potential. Sodium channel fast inactivation contributes to Phase 1, the initial repolarization. Slow inactivation and closed state fast inactivation determine channel availability and, thus, overall membrane excitability. Defects in any of these biophysical states or transitions between them, imparted by (over 170 reported thus far, including both Long QT3 and Brugada syndromes) mutations in the (over 2000) amino acids that compose the sodium channel protein, can lead to channel dysfunction that manifests as an abnormal cardiac action potential and electrocardiogram. A causal relationship between several such abnormalities and the panoply of sodium channel mutations have led to a greater understanding of the molecular underpinnings of cardiac arrhythmias as well as a deeper appreciation for the intricacies of sodium channel function. Here, we review the literature regarding these causal relationships from a perspective of the biophysical properties of sodium channels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".