MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P1-S1.44 Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of<i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i>isolates in the Province of QuÉbec - 2010

2011· article· en· W2015322026 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brigitte Lefebvre, Anne–Marie Bourgault

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCefiximeSpectinomycinNeisseria gonorrhoeaeAzithromycinMedicineMicrobiologyCeftriaxoneAgar dilutionMinimum inhibitory concentrationCiprofloxacinUrethritisAntibacterial agentAntibiotic resistanceAntibioticsVeterinary medicineInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Regular monitoring of antimicrobial resistance ofN gonorrhoeaeis necessary to detect the trend in antimicrobial resistance, increases in minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and to assist in the development of treatment guidelines. Methods In 2010, allN gonorrhoeaestrains isolated in clinical laboratories throughout the province were submitted to the Laboratoire de santé publique du Québec where their susceptibility profile to azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin and spectinomycin was determined by the agar dilution method. Results A total of 831 strains isolated from 607 males and 224 females were tested. The strains were recovered from (data available for 819 strains) the following specimens—urethra, 432; cervix, 191; anus, 100; throat, 90; eye, 4; and synovial fluid, 2. All strains were susceptible to cefixime, ceftriaxone and spectinomycin, 270 (32.5%) were resistant to ciprofloxacin and 11 (1.3%) were resistant to azithromycin (MIC ≥2 mg/l). The azithromycin resistant isolates were retrieved from 11 males aged 16–55 years (mean, 30) from the Montreal area (urethra, 8; throat, 3). The azithromycin MIC distribution was as follows—4 mg/l (n=1), 8 mg/l (n=6), 16 mg/l (n=4). No highly resistant organism (MIC>128 mg/l) was identified. Among the azithromycin resistant isolates, one was resistant to ciprofloxacin but all were susceptible to cefixime, ceftriaxone and spectinomycin. In 2010, 68 (8.2%) isolates exhibited decreased susceptibility to cefixime (MIC=0.125 mg/l [n=62] and 0.25 mg/l [n=6]). Of these 68 isolates, all were susceptible to azithromycin and ceftriaxone but all were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Only one isolate showed decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone (MIC=0.125 mg/l)—this isolate also showed decreased susceptibility to cefixime. Conclusions As observed elsewhere,N gonorrhoeaestrains are showing a worrisome drift in susceptibility to cefixime, a first line treatment for gonococcal infections associated with resistance to ciprofloxacin. Furthermore, resistance to azithromycin, a second line treatment option, is emerging. Sustained collaborative laboratory surveillance programs are mandatory for the design of public health interventions to prevent and control gonococcal infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207