Proteomic Validation of Protease Drug Targets: Pharmacoproteomics of Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor Drugs Using Isotope-Coded Affinity Tag Labelling and Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We illustrate the use of quantitative proteomics, namely isotope-coded affinity tag labelling and tandem mass spectrometry, to assess the targets and effects of the blockade of matrix metalloproteinases by an inhibitor drug in a breast cancer cell culture system. Treatment of MT1-MMP-transfected MDA-MB-231 cells with AG3340 (Prinomastat) directly affected the processing a multitude of matrix metalloproteinase substrates, and indirectly altered the expression of an array of other proteins with diverse functions. Therefore, broad spectrum blockade of MMPs has wide-ranging biological consequences. In this human breast cancer cell line, secreted substrates accumulated uncleaved in the conditioned medium and plasma membrane protein substrates were retained on the cell surface, due to reduced processing and shedding of these proteins (cell surface receptors, growth factors and bioactive molecules) to the medium in the presence of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor. Hence, proteomic investigation of drug-perturbed cellular proteomes can identify new protease substrates and at the same time provides valuable information for target validation, drug efficacy and potential side effects prior to commitment to clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".