Beneficial and harmful effects of oscillatory mechanical strain on airway smooth muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells are constantly under mechanical strain as the lung cyclically expands and deflates, and this stretch is now known to modulate the contractile function of ASM. However, depending on the experimental conditions, stretch is either beneficial or harmful limiting or enhancing contractile force generation, respectively. Stretch caused by a deep inspiration is known to be beneficial in limiting or reversing airway constriction in healthy individuals, and oscillatory stretch lowers contractile force and stiffness or lengthens muscle in excised airway tissue strips. Stretch in ASM culture has generally been reported to cause increased contractile function through increases in proliferation, contractile protein content, and organization of the cell cytoskeleton. Recent evidence indicates the type of stretch is critically important. Growing cells on flexible membranes where stretch is non-uniform and anisotropic leads to pro-contractile changes, whereas uniform biaxial stretch causes the opposite effects. Furthermore, the role of contractile tone might be important in modulating the response to mechanical stretch in cultured cells. This report will review the contrasting evidence for modulation of contractile function of ASM, both in vivo and in vitro, and summarize the recent evidence that mechanical stress applied either acutely within 2 h or chronically over 11 d is a potent stimulus for cytoskeletal remodelling and stiffening. We will also point to new data suggesting that perhaps some of the difference in response to stretch might lie with one of the fundamental differences in the ASM environment in asthma and in culture--the presence of elevated contractile tone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".