MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015534987 · doi:10.1029/2004jd005093

Doubled CO<sub>2</sub>‐induced cooling in the middle atmosphere: Photochemical analysis of the ozone radiative feedback

2004· article· en· W2015534987 on OpenAlex
A. I. Jonsson, J. de Grandpré, V. I. Fomichev, J. C. McConnell, S. R. Beagley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityYork University
FundersCanadian Space AgencyStockholms UniversitetUniversity of TorontoCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
KeywordsStratopauseStratosphereOzoneAtmospheric sciencesAtmosphere (unit)Environmental scienceRadiative transferMixing ratioTroposphereMesosphereRadiative coolingMeteorologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simple radiative arguments predict that the impact of CO 2 increases on the stratosphere and mesosphere should be a cooling and that the magnitude of the temperature change should be significantly larger than in the troposphere. Considering the temperature dependence of middle atmospheric gas‐phase ozone photochemistry, it is expected that the ozone response will generate a radiative feedback that mitigates the CO 2 ‐induced cooling. The magnitude and vertical structure of this signal need to be characterised in order to distinguish the impact of future CO 2 changes from other processes affecting the temperature evolution, such as changes in chlorine loading and water vapour trends. The Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model (CMAM) has been used in a process oriented study to examine the details of radiative and photochemical feedbacks under current and doubled CO 2 conditions at low and middle latitudes. The model was run both with and without interactive chemistry in order to determine the importance of the radiative feedback through ozone changes on the CO 2 ‐induced cooling signal. Changes in other greenhouse gases, ozone depleting substances, or SST's and sea ice coverage were not considered. The interactive model results show a substantial temperature decrease throughout most of the middle atmosphere with a maximum cooling of 10–12 K at the stratopause. In association with this temperature change, the ozone mixing ratio increases by 15–20% in the upper stratosphere and by 10–15% in the lower mesosphere. Results from the non‐interactive simulations show that the magnitude of the cooling is overestimated by up to ∼4.5 K when the ozone radiative feedback is not considered. In spite of the complexity of the ozone chemistry, the ozone increase at 30–70 km can be understood primarily as a result of the negative temperature dependence of the O + O 2 + M → O 3 + M reaction that controls odd oxygen partitioning. Additional partial contributions to the ozone increase below 60 km are provided by a decrease in the reaction rate coefficient of the Chapman reaction O + O 3 → 2O 2 and by a decrease in the NO 2 abundance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it