MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015545704 · doi:10.1159/000185812

Development and Progression of Uremic Changes in the Mouse with Surgically Induced Renal Failure

2008· article· en· W2015545704 on OpenAlexaff
Raymonde F. Gagnon, Massoud Ansari

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenin-Angiotensin System Studies
Canadian institutionsMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUremiaNephrectomyKidneyKidney diseaseAnemiaPathogenesisUrologyChronic renal failureSurgeryNephrologyInternal medicineGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adult C57BL/6 mice with surgically induced renal failure of 1-15 weeks' duration were examined for the presence of changes caused by the renal failure. Surgery consisted of the electrocoagulation of the entire surface of the right kidney followed 3 weeks later by contralateral nephrectomy. Control groups comprised normal mice as well as sham-operated mice subjected to the right kidney electrocoagulation followed by visualization of the left kidney rather than removal. Results indicate: (1) the surgical procedures to induce renal failure were free of local and systemic infectious complications, (2) moderate to severe degree of renal failure was consistently achieved and remained stable over the study period, (3) significant growth retardation of the renal failure mice was present throughout the study whereas sham-operated mice showed catch-up growth with normal controls by the 3rd week postsurgery, (4) anemia was a very early manifestation of the disease appearing by the 1st week after the induction of renal failure to reach its nadir by the 2nd week; a mild anemia was observed transiently postsurgery in sham-operated mice and ascribed to the renal injury, and (5) renal failure mice were free of visible changes of advanced uremia such as impaired wound healing, bleeding tendency and gross neurological deficits. This new experimental model is proposed as a tool for the study of the pathogenesis and treatment of chronic uremia. While developed to study the immunological disturbances of renal failure, this model could conceivably serve for the study of other abnormalities, anemia in particular.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journalsSame topicRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesFrench-language works237,207