I-vector-based speaker adaptation of deep neural networks for French broadcast audio transcription
Bibliographic record
Abstract
State of the art speaker recognition systems are based on the i-vector representation of speech segments. In this paper we show how this representation can be used to perform blind speaker adaptation of hybrid DNN-HMM speech recognition system and we report excellent results on a French language audio transcription task. The implemenation is very simple. An audio file is first diarized and each speaker cluster is represented by an i-vector. Acoustic feature vectors are augmented by the corresponding i-vectors before being presented to the DNN. (The same i-vector is used for all acoustic feature vectors aligned with a given speaker.) This supplementary information improves the DNN's ability to discriminate between phonetic events in a speaker independent way without having to make any modification to the DNN training algorithms. We report results on the ETAPE 2011 transcription task, and show that i-vector based speaker adaptation is effective irrespective of whether cross-entropy or sequence training is used. For cross-entropy training, we obtained a word error rate (WER) reduction from 22.16% to 20.67% whereas for sequence training the WER reduces from 19.93% to 18.40%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".