Fluorescence Study of Inclusion Complexes between Star-Shaped Cholic Acid Derivatives and Polycyclic Aromatic Fluorescent Probes and the Size Effects of Host and Guest Molecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Star-shaped host molecules containing two, three, and four cholic acid moieties have been used to form inclusion complexes with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon probes (guests) varying in size from four (pyrene) to five (benzo(e)pyrene) and seven aromatic rings (coronene) and investigated by steady-state fluorescence measurements and fluorescence lifetime techniques. The results indicated that these hydrophobic guest probes prefer to locate in the hydrophobic cavities formed by the host molecules in an aqueous solution. Further studies showed that the stoichiometric ratios of the complexes depended on the relative size of both the host and the guest. The complexes of 1:1 ratio (guest:host) were formed between pyrene and the host molecules of different sizes, while the complexes of 1:2 ratio (guest:host) were found for coronene in all cases. For benzo(e)pyrene with an intermediate size, the complexes with 1:1 and 1:2 ratios (guest:host) were formed depending on the relative sizes of the host molecules. The stability of the inclusion complexes was observed to change with the solvent polarity, indicative of an adaptation of the hydrophobicity of the host pockets to the polarity of the solvent. The formation of the complexes was driven by the solvophobic interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".