MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015713596 · doi:10.4043/25378-ms

Case Study of Geotechnical Site Investigation using a Seafloor Drilling Unit, Large-diameter Cores, and Coring-vessel-deployed Cone Penetration Tests in the Gulf of Mexico

2014· article· en· W2015713596 on OpenAlexaff
C. Caruthers, R. Hartsfield, A. G. Young, Daniel Robert Spikula, John Dobias, Michael R. Fitzpatrick, Bernard D. Remmes

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsIntecsea (Canada)
FundersHess Corporation
KeywordsCoringSeafloor spreadingDrillingGeologyGeotechnical engineeringCone penetration testStandard penetration testPenetration (warfare)Scientific drillingMarine engineeringEngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper compares results of a deepwater geotechnical investigation using a seafloor drilling system, large-diameter core samples, and cone penetration tests performed from a coring vessel with results of a geotechnical investigation performed from a conventional drillship. The paper reports the first use of a seafloor drilling unit in the Gulf of Mexico to conduct a geotechnical site investigation for the mooring design of a floating platform. Common practice in the Gulf of Mexico for geotechnical investigations of anchor spreads for moored production facilities has been to perform seafloor cone penetration tests and to drill and sample one or more soil borings. "Soil borings" are prescribed but not defined by 30 CFR 250.19 API RP 2SK1 recognizes currently available site investigation tools, such as large-diameter core samples, that could be used in lieu of rotary soil borings; however, some certified verification authorities/agents (CVAs) have been reluctant to accept the use of API-accepted methods of site investigations in the Gulf of Mexico. Seafloor drilling units have been used successfully in various parts of the world, and cone penetration tests from a coring vessel have been performed and studied at numerous sites, both in the Gulf of Mexico and worldwide. This paper demonstrates that a seafloor drilling unit, large-diameter cores, and coring-vessel-deployed cone penetration tests integrated with AUV subbottom profile data can be used in the Gulf of Mexico without reliance on samples obtained from a drillship. Cone penetration resistance is compared using different cone systems and deployment methods at nearby locations. Results are essentially identical. Representative soil sample data are compared, and geotechnical laboratory test results are very similar. The paper confirms that when ASTM standards for cone testing and thin-walled-tube sampling are used, consistent results can be obtained from site investigations performed from seafloor drilling units and coring vessels or purpose-built geotechnical drillships. Integrated site investigation programs using technologies such as seafloor drilling units, large diameter coring, and cone penetration testing from a coring vessel should be acceptable for site investigations without special regulatory approvals beyond those that would apply to a site investigation program performed from a purpose-built geotechnical drillship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207