Bases for Interactions between Saflufenacil and Glyphosate in Plants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Buckwheat (Fagropyrum esculentum Moench.), cabbage (Brassica oleracea L), and conventional and glyphosate-resistant varieties of canola (Brassica napus L.) were used to study the bases of saflufenacil and glyphosate interactions. Compared to the addition of Merge (surfactant), the addition of both Transorb (i.e., commercial product, Transorb formulation with glyphosate) and Merge increased the cuticular absorption of [(14)C] saflufenacil in cabbage plants with thick epicuticular wax layers. However, in all cases, the addition of glyphosate reduced the translocation of [(14)C]saflufenacil in glyphosate-susceptible plants, while translocation was not affected in glyphosate-resistant canola. Moreover, the phytotoxicity of saflufenacil reduced the activity of glyphosate, possibly by reducing its translocation in all plant species studied. Increased absorption of saflufenacil by the addition of Transorb (i.e., Transorb formulation with glyphosate) plus Merge appears to increase its contact activity, thus the interaction of saflufenacil and glyphosate involves two separate processes, absorption and translocation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".