MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015745099 · doi:10.1080/15715124.2011.565771

A simplified direct method for finding optimal stable trapezoidal channels

2011· article· en· W2015745099 on OpenAlexaff
Said M. Easa, Ali R. Vatankhah, A O Abd El Halim

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of River Basin Management · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDam Engineering and Safety
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStability (learning theory)Channel (broadcasting)Sensitivity (control systems)ChartCross section (physics)Mathematical optimizationOptimal designFlow (mathematics)MathematicsControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceEngineeringStatisticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An economical channel with trapezoidal cross-section is determined in this paper by considering the criterion for the side slope stability (soil conditions). This cross-section prevents the slope failure after construction. To implement this slope stability criterion, Taylor's stability chart is converted to a polynomial surface equation (using multiple regression analysis) that was found to be very accurate. This equation facilitates the modelling of the optimal channel cross-section and was integrated with the flow and geometric constraints to determine the optimal channel cross-section that minimizes the total construction cost. The proposed optimization model is direct and determines the safety factor without iterations. The computer running time of the proposed model is only about 1% of the running time of the existing hybrid model. The efficiency of the proposed model, which substantially aids the conduct of sensitivity analysis, should be of interest to irrigation and drainage professionals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of River Basin ManagementSame topicDam Engineering and SafetyFrench-language works237,207